"Electronic records" is a particularly awful phrase and does not even actually capture anything about the underlying records at all. As far as the term goes, it's not too far off from "machine readable records." As a profession, can we start actually thinking critically about the underlying technical issues and push for using terms that more accurately describe what it is we're dealing with? I understand it's a convenient catch-all term, but there is a large range of issues that differ with the kinds of data and systems.
The Medium Is Not The Message
May 11th, 2009 | Electronic Records
0 comments ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment